Abortion

11 weeks old, I saw one like this at The Human Body Exhibition.

11 weeks old, I saw one like this at The Human Body Exhibition.

“In war, truth is the first casualty” – Aeschylus. And so it is in the abortion war between the bigoted partisans of the Pro-abortion Vs Anti-abortion divide. In a recent TV debate I was struck by the disinformation trotted out, non-issues and red-herrings. I don’t care if you’re for or against abortion. But people should make rational decisions based on accurate information – not disinformation and propaganda; wherever it may arise. Here I address some of the disinformation…

Continue reading

Posted in Social Commentary | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Jupiter, Earths Moon & more in Time Lapse Astro-photgraphy

Jupiter and our Moon

Jupiter and our Moon

Last night Jupiter was pretty close to our Moon, or at least it appeared that way from my reference frame, Earth ;) So I unleashed my camera, did some time-lapse astro-photography, and made a movie using those images. The big bright thing that looks like the Sun – that is actually sunlight, reflected from the Moons surface. Below and to the right of the Moon, that bright ‘star’ – that is actually sunlight, reflected from Jupiter :)

In addition to our Moon, and Jupiter; you’ll also see several constellations including the Pleiades, Taurus, Orion (including Betelgeuse, and the Orion nebula aka M42), and Gemini. Although having looked at how Windows Movie Maker and YouTube have ‘massaged’ the images I’m greatly disappointed. Does anyone know some decent software to generate movies from JPEG or .CR2 or similar filetypes? Anyway, here’s the video… Continue reading

Posted in Astronomy, Astrophotography, Hobbies, Photography, Physics, Science | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Motor Vehicle Registration Numbers

Registration Number

Vehicle Registration - or not :)

You’ve just bought a new car or motorbike and you’ve got to get it registered. Many of us like to get a vehicle registration number that we like, rather than a random string of alphanumeric symbols. Some countries allow personalised number plates that stay with the person, not the vehicle. Not so in Ireland, where the registration stays with the vehicle for life.

I like the Irish registration system because it’s both informative and simple, like me lol. Each vehicle is assigned a registration in a format like this “11 – D – 12345″. The “11″ corresponds to the year of registration of the vehicle i.e. 2011. The “D” is the county where the vehicle was registered i.e. Dublin in this example. The “12345″ is a unique number for that year for that county, beginning at “1″ (for the first car of the year) and incrementing for each subsequent vehicle registration. So the first vehicle registered in Dublin in 2011 was 11-D-1, the 123rd registered in Dublin in 2011 was 11-D-123, and so on. Continue reading

Posted in Miscellaneous, Social Commentary | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

On Infinity and Atoms, Mathematics and Physics

Infinite Infinity?

Infinite Infinity?

While reading a New Scientist article entitled “Ultimate Logic: To infinity and beyond” I enjoyed reading about the distinction between “countable infinity” (e.g. 1,2,3,4,…) and “continuum infinity” (e.g. 0.1, 0.2,… 0.01, 0.02, …, 0.001, 0.002, …, …). It’s something I had realised myself (as I’m sure many others have) – different ‘levels’ of infinity. Of course I didn’t use those fancy terms and I’m 140 years after Georg Cantor first proposed it, so no prizes for being first. But…

But I thought further* and realised that the counting infinity and continuum infinity become one and the same when the counting step is, you guessed it, infinitesimally small i.e. 0.000…1

* perhaps further than some mathematicians; if not then I expect one will soon point out the flaw in my logic :)

Similarly in physics I find the concept of an atom i.e. an indivisible piece of matter, to be illogical in the physical world. Given the equivalence of matter and energy (E = mc2), it seems to me that any such fundamental particle (i.e. a truly atomic particle) would have an energy equivalence which is infinitesimally small. So it seems to me that any search for “fundamental particle(s)” is flawed, however worthwhile the search is itself. I say that since an infinitesimally small amount of energy may not physically exist, and if it does it’s undetectable with our instrumentation.

Finally, it seems to me that just because something is proven in mathematics, doesn’t imply it must exist in the physical world. Or is there a proof to show this false?

Posted in Mathematics, Physics, Science | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

E = mc2 – Deriving units

Einstein

Einstein is Relatively Special

Recently the question of the units of energy in Einsteins E = mc2 came up in conversation. It seems the “meters squared” caused confusion. So here’s a short derivation of the units for energy.

The speed of light in a vacuum is denoted ‘c’ (lower case).  The mass of a particle is ‘m’. E is energy.
The units in E = mc2 are derived as follows:
E = mc2    (Eqn. 1)
E = Energy, measured in units of Joule
m = mass, measured in units of kg
c = speed, measured in units of ms-1 (meters per second)
Note that ‘^’ denotes “raised to the power” e.g. c2 = “c raised to the power 2″ i.e. squared.

Taking the left hand side of the equality (the Energy):
Energy = force x distance    (Eqn. 2)
Force = mass x acceleration    (Eqn. 3)
Combining Eqn2 & Eqn.3 gives
Energy = mass x acceleration x distance    (Eqn. 4)
Substituting units into Eqn. 4 gives
Joule = kg x ms-2 x m    (Eqn. 5)
Joule = kg m2 s-2    (Eqn. 6)

Taking the right hand side of the equality (mc2):
mc2 = mcc    (Eqn. 7)
Substituting units into Eqn. 7 gives
= kg ms-1 ms-1    (Eqn. 8 )
= kg m2 s-2 (Eqn. 9)

Now lets bring both sides together:
Recall Eqn. 1: E = mc2
Substituting the left hand side (Eqn. 6) and the right hand side (Eqn. 9) gives:
kg m2 s-2 = kg m2 s-2
Q.E.D.

P.S. There is a relativistic form of E = mc2 which deals with particles travelling close to the speed of light.

Posted in Physics, Science | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Bear Grylls Mud Sweat And Tears – Review

Bear Grylls Mud Sweat And Tears

Bear Grylls - The Real Deal

In my previous blog post I spoke about Bear Grylls book Facing Up which is about his attempt at climbing Mount Everest. It was a good start in getting to know Bear Grylls the man. But this book Mud Sweat And Tears is Bears autobiography and it should be definitive in answering the question: Is he the real deal, or is he too good to be true? Spoiler: He’s the real deal.

He’s an Etonian, he’s passed SAS Selection, he’s the youngest Briton to have reached the summit of Mount Everest, and we’ve all seen his death-defying and stomach-churning ‘antics’ on Bear Grylls Born Survivor (aka Man vs Wild). There’s no question he’s the real deal. He’s a committed family man and father to his 3 young sons. It’s good to see the first ‘F’ in Bears 5 F’s is for Family (the others are Friends, Faith [meh, nobody is perfect!], Fun, Follow your dream). Bear has the privilege of being Chief Scout to the UK Scout Association; and as a former Scout myself I can only imagine how inspirational he is to Scouts (and people) all over the world.

Rating: 80% (that’s pretty good!)

Bear has done several other adventures and many in aid of charity: crossed the North Atlantic Artic Ocean in an open boat; climbed unclimbed peaks in Antartica; flew a powered paraglider above the summit of Everest; lead the first expedition through the Artics Northwest Passage in a rigid inflatable boat; jet-skied around Britain; hosted the highest ever party suspended under a hot air balloon (at 25000 feet).

But Bear Grylls hasn’t had it all his own way. He initially failed SAS Selection. But, after being invited to re-apply, he succeeded. He broke 3 vertebrae in his back in a parachuting accident and that ended his SAS career, but it also sparked his determination to attempt to climb Everest. He broke his shoulder in a climbing accident, and his leg on an ice-slope. But in each case he came back stronger.

Not everyone is that lucky. Some people have accidents which they don’t recover from. The real measure is what we do with what we’ve got. And sometimes the greatest heroism comes from those who have so little, yet do so much. The fact is that Bear Grylls is just an ordinary guy, but he’s done extraordinary things.

If you’re a devout cynic and only want to focus on the negative then you may get some solace by thinking of Bear Grylls as a college dropout. Annoyingly for you (and for me, as a holder of graduate and postgraduate degrees), that puts him in some very esteemed company.

I enjoyed reading Mud Sweat And Tears and give it 8 out of 10. It’s an easy read and Bears writing style is great. Top man.

Posted in Books, Reviews | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Bear Grylls Facing Up – Review

Bear Grylls Facing Up

Bear Grylls Facing Up & Succeeding

The name Bear Grylls is synonymous with adventure, danger, survival, and eating & drinking things you wouldn’t normally touch with a barge pole! Would you drink your own urine from a gutted snakeskin? I suppose the only thing worse would be drinking someone elses, lol. Like about 1.2 billion other people who watch Bear Grylls Born Survivor (aka Man vs Wild), I wanted to know more about this seeming daredevil adventurer. Was he too good to be true? I hoped not, but I have a healthy scepticism…

So in an attempt to get to know the man Bear Grylls a bit better I bought his book “Facing Up” which tells the story of his attempt to climb Mount Everest; which I discuss below. I also bought his autobiography “Mud Sweat And Tears” which I’ll discuss in my next blog post. You can follow Bear on twitter @BearGrylls

Rating: 90% (that’s pretty dang good!)

I’m happy to say I thoroughly enjoyed reading Facing Up, and for me it was a real page turner. I wanted to know what happened next, did he make the next bit or was it a disaster? I kept on reading. I like Bears writing style, he puts you on the mountain and in his head with his inner thoughts, he shares the personal struggle. Of course, it’s impossible to physically transmit the actual cold, tiredness, hunger, lack of oxygen, and pain he endured (thankfully for that you have to actually be on Everest); but he does effectively communicate the mental impact of it all.

And, although we live in a physical world, our only experience of it is mental. Ask any person involved in any endurance activity and they’ll tell you the real struggle is mental, not physical. The beauty of this fact is that Bear can and does communicate that mental experience very effectively. I have to say it was nice to step off the mountain (put the book down) and have a nice hot cuppa, that’s a luxury life on Everest does not afford.

In my attempt to get to know Bear Grylls the man a bit better I’ll say I’m well impressed having read Facing Up. Against the odds, Bears Everest attempt was successful, he was the youngest ever Briton to reach the peak at age 23. But was this a once off, an aberration, or does he really have the right stuff? Next up I’ll post my review of his #1 selling book Mud Sweat And Tears, then I’ll know for sure.

Should you read Facing Up? Yes. Well, I think it’s a fine book anyway. If you’ve any interest in adventure, Bear Grylls, the human condition, psychology, sociology, or Everest then it’s an obvious yes. For me it’s a 9 out of 10 rating.

Posted in Books, Reviews | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

To PhD or not to PhD, that is the Question.

This morning I wrote an email to a Professor at my local University informing him that regrettably I won’t be pursuing a PhD there. It was not an everyday email to write, but in the last 12 years it was the fifth time I turned down a PhD opportunity. Two were in Physics, and three were in Computer Science, and the offers came from three different Universities.

It may seem I don’t want to do a PhD, but I do, kind of. So why all the refusals, you may well ask? The reason has always been financial. And it’s the same reason that in all likelihood I won’t be pursuing a PhD anywhere anytime soon. Maybe the much vaunted Irish “knowledge economy” isn’t targeted at thirty-somethings, but who would find these figures attractive? …

This particular PhD programme was structured over 4 years. The first year has a tax free stipend of €16,500, with the subsequent three years at €19,000. This is reasonably generous as PhD programmes go. If you’re a young free and single undergraduate you may look at those figures and be happy; but if you’re a postgraduate with a family and bills to pay you will probably look at those figures with dismay and derision (your bank manager certainly will, and your spouse may even hit you).

Let’s put those figures in context. The minimum wage in Ireland at the time of writing is €8.65 per hour [1]. At 35 hours per week (9-5 job) for 52 weeks that’s an annual income of €15,743.

An average family (2 parents and 2 children) where both adults are unemployed will get welfare from the state of €372.40 per week [2] (188+124.80+2(29.80)), or €19,364.80 annually.

A Computer Science or ICT graduate can have a starting salary of roughly €30,000, and with 4 years experience can be anywhere north of €60,000.

Taking on a PhD is a long term commitment and it comes at a severe financial strain. There’s also the uncertainty, you’re guaranteed nothing – many a fine prospect floundered on their PhD. You could spend four years or more and come out of it with nothing to show except a gaping hole in your CV.

And there’s the life postponement: You won’t buy a house on a PhD stipend (although with the housing market on its knees that may change, lol kind of). You won’t support a family on a PhD stipend. You won’t be buying a car or going on any holidays. The net result is that you end up postponing the rest of your life for 4 or more years. These are the sacrifices I haven’t been willing to make, and I’m not sure I’ll ever be willing to make.

I think the government should seriously re-evaluate what price they are willing to pay for a PhD graduate. It’s particularly nauseating when you consider the millions wasted in FAS (the corrupt and defunct state training agency); and the billions wasted in NAMA (the borrowing of billions to repay the loans of reckless free-market capitalist companies, and then passing that debt onto the Irish taxpayer).

 

Posted in Computer Science, Physics, Science, Social Commentary | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

BBC Horizon – Do You See What I See. [Nope!]

I just finished watching the first episode in the new BBC Horizon series, it was entitled “Do You See What I See“. It was interesting but at the same time disappointing. I would summarise the subject matter in general terms as What you perceive is subjective, what actually exists is objective. In this episode they talk about colour, but it can be equally applied to light/dark, pain, temperature, taste, loudness/quietness etc.

One thing I didn’t like was when Dr Beau Lotto makes statements like: colour is an illusion, colour doesn’t exist. Ok, it’s a popular science program not an academic conference, but FFS get the simple things right and be clear about them. If you want to assert that each individuals perception of colour is different – that’s fine. If you want to say that colour is a human construct of language that describes a perception – that’s fine. But be clear about what your saying. Assertions like colour doesn’t exist can only be designed as headline-seeking-soundbytes, and they do a disservice to science and otherwise respected programmes like Horizon, imho.

Electromagnetic Spectrum

Electromagnetic Spectrum (Image: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:EM_spectrum.svg)

In Physics we tend to be quite specific when we talk about colour, i.e. we talk about the wavelength of electromagnetic radiation. The electromagnetic spectrum includes visible light, x-rays, radio-waves, microwaves, etc. We use wavelength of EM spectrum because it is objective, observable, measurable, and reproducible; whereas colour perception is purely subjective. We use equipment to measure the wavelength and it has a number not a name. So while we can say Sodium burns with an orange glow, it’ll be backed up with a wavelength such as 589 nanometers (and include a stated margin of error depending on equipment used).

But there were interesting parts too. The effect of language on colour was fascinating, and this was brilliantly demonstrated with a piece on the Himba tribe of Northern Namibia. They classify colours in a different manner to most Westerners and have only about half the (names for) colours we use. So they say milk is white, but they also consider water as white – we’d consider it transparent (or blue according to the programme). But the most interesting part was where the Himba couldn’t easily discern between certain shades of blue/green – which would be easy for Westerners; but conversely there were shades of brown/green they could easily discern which Westerners struggle to discern. I’ve also noted that children (Western and presumably all children) will describe water as white – until they’re told it’s transparent (or blue if that’s what some people call it).

Other interesting aspects of colour included how our perception of colour is effected by the surrounding colours, by colours we’ve just been looking at, by age, gender, etc. There are countless optical illusions (google it) that brilliantly demonstrate, imho, what we see is a subjective perception; the reality in the external world is an independent objective reality.

This episode was a good start to the Horizon series, which itself is a stalwart well worth a series-record. Go Horizon!

As always, feel free to comment, tweet, like, +1 etc.

 

Posted in Documentary, Physics, Reviews, Science | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Amy Winehouse – The lesser of two Tragedies

Amy Winehouse - dead at 27

The sudden and untimely death of 27 year-old singer-songwriter Amy Winehouse is a tragedy. I wasn’t sure “tragedy” was the correct word, but it is. One definition of “tragedy” is “a dramatic composition, often in verse, dealing with a serious or somber theme, typically that of a great person destined through a flaw of character or conflict with some overpowering force, as fate or society, to downfall or destruction.” She was a great talent, and she had a flaw (substance abuse) which ultimately destroyed her life; indeed a tragedy.

Where does your drug money go?

But as tragic as Amys untimely death is, it’s not the real tragedy here. The real tragedy is the lack of awareness, or worse, the callas disregard of how substance abusers actions impact other peoples lives; and the failure to accept responsibility for their actions. I’m talking about the impact the illegal drugs industry has on the lives of millions of people who are caught up in it – innocent farmers whose land is taken; those who are killed because they spoke out against drug barons; the drug mules forced to carry their deadly cargo internally or externally; those who live in constant fear in communities ravaged by drug addiction and attendant crime. These people are the real victims of drug abuse. The sad fact is substance abusers like Amy Winehouse fund this tyranny.

Substance abusers should recognise and accept they are a root cause of this misery. Without the purchasing power of willing substance abusers there would be no market for the drug barons. It’s a law of economics “supply and demand”. So the next time you or someone in your social circle buy or use some drugs (regardless of how small) be aware of where and to whom the money for those drugs is going; it’s going to drug gangs in poor neighbourhoods, to drug barons in your city, and drug cartels internationally. And be aware that your drug-funding impacts massively on the real victims of drug abuse. Then make an informed and conscious decision about whether or not you really care one iota about the misery the drug industry you fund has wrought on individuals, families, communities, and societies all over the world.

Innocent man murdered in drug-war crossfire

One such example is the callous murder of an innocent young man, Anthony Campbell a 20 year old apprentice plumber who was but murdered simply because he was a potential witness to a gangland murder. Here’s an excerpt from the Coroners inquest as reported by the Irish TimesDetective Inspector Kieran McEneaney told an inquest into the double murders that Mr Campbell was killed to eliminate any risk of Hyland’s [a known criminal and target of the hit by other criminals] killers being identified at a later date. “Sinister criminal elements of a serious criminal persuasion were involved in the deliberate and violent murder of Martin Hyland and in the ruthless taking of the young life of Anthony Campbell,” he said. Coroner Dr Kieran Geraghty said Mr Campbell was a “hard-working and innocent young man who was callously and brutally murdered.”

And while some might claim their individual drug use makes no difference, they probably buy fair-trade coffee and recycle their waste because they believe that does make a difference. And it does, because a group of individuals acting collectively will make a difference.

The death of Amy Winehouse (and many more like her)  is a tragedy. But the real tragedy is that Amy and all drug-abusers fund a drug-industry that destroys the lives of millions of truly innocent victims.

Update: 26-Oct-2011. The inquest into Amys death concluded that on the balance of probabilities she died from misadventure. The medical evidence presented showed that she had prescription drugs in her system including librium (used to counteract the effects of alcohol withdrawal syndrome); the levels of alcohol in her system were over 5 times the drink driving limit (80mg alcohol per 100ml blood), she had 416mg per 100ml blood. It is perhaps ironic, given the hard core drugs she had used, that it was the good old reliable alcohol that got her in the end.

Posted in Social Commentary | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment